首页> 外文OA文献 >Databases for stolen art: progress, prospects and limitations
【2h】

Databases for stolen art: progress, prospects and limitations

机译:被盗艺术数据库:进展,前景和局限

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Addressing the illicit trade in stolen works of art and other heritage items is notoriously difficult. Before thefts of heritage items can be recorded, the object in question must be identified as having special significance.The investigation of the circumstances in which such an object was acquired and the enforcement of legal and ethical standards of acquisition become unduly complicated in the absence of a comprehensive national\udinventory of museum holdings and of a database of stolen art and cultural objects. This article considers the\uddevelopment of inventories and databases in South Africa and elsewhere. We argue that cross-sectoral cooperation\udin sharing databases needs to improve significantly in order to boost compliance with due diligence standards. To help restore the credibility of the trade in art and cultural objects, the South African Heritage Resources Information System site must be endorsed as the centralised database for heritage crime. This would provide ready access to databases, helping art market participants, law enforcement officers and customs officials in the investigation of stolen art works.
机译:众所周知,解决被盗艺术品和其他文物的非法贸易非常困难。在记录盗窃的文物之前,必须先确定所涉物品具有特殊意义。在没有物品保护的情况下,对这种物品的购置情况以及法律和道德标准的执行进行的调查变得异常复杂。博物馆藏品以及被盗艺术品和文物数据库的综合国家\目录。本文考虑了南非和其他地方的库存和数据库的发展。我们认为,跨部门合作\ udin共享数据库需要大大改善,以增强对尽职调查标准的遵守。为了帮助恢复艺术品和文化物品贸易的信誉,必须认可南非遗产资源信息系统站点作为遗产犯罪的集中数据库。这样可以方便地访问数据库,从而帮助艺术品市场参与者,执法人员和海关官员调查被盗的艺术品。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号